Skip to Main Content
Caesar Zeppeli (
mylegacy
) wrote
2015
-
11
-
22
06:54 pm
ic inbox ( ruby city )
"Leave a message,
per favore
; I'll be back before you know it."
[
text|voice|video
]
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
mylegacy
2016-04-07 06:11 am (UTC)
(
link
)
You might be a little whipped.
[— thank you, pot.]
no subject
lapidarius
2016-04-07 06:12 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Oh,
like hell I am.
[if anyone is whipped in this relationship it is both of them.]
Just because he got away with something once doesn't mean he always does.
no subject
mylegacy
2016-04-07 06:16 am (UTC)
(
link
)
That's kind of a big something.
no subject
lapidarius
2016-04-07 06:24 am (UTC)
(
link
)
It was
one time.
If he tried to pull something like that again I'd probably punch him.
no subject
mylegacy
2016-04-07 06:26 am (UTC)
(
link
)
"Probably".
no subject
lapidarius
2016-04-07 06:27 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Well I'm hardly going to try to break his nose, I reserve that kind of thing for Polnareff.
Edited
2016-04-07 06:27 (UTC)
no subject
mylegacy
2016-04-07 06:40 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Polnareff is
annoying.
no subject
lapidarius
2016-04-07 06:42 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Usually, yes.
[and he loves his friend so much, that idiot.]
no subject
mylegacy
2016-04-07 06:58 am (UTC)
(
link
)
. . . He's annoying, but you still like him.
[There's a questioning undercurrent here.
Explain.
]
no subject
lapidarius
2016-04-07 07:00 am (UTC)
(
link
)
...Let me put it this way.
'Annoying' is likely one of the first terms one would use to describe Joseph Joestar if they just met him.
['but you freely associate with him for roughly similar reasons.']
no subject
mylegacy
2016-04-07 07:02 am (UTC)
(
link
)
I wasn't trying to be rude.
[Okay but you were, though.]
no subject
lapidarius
2016-04-07 07:07 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Neither was I. Stating an objective fact isn't rude, it's being honest.
no subject
mylegacy
2016-04-07 07:16 am (UTC)
(
link
)
It
sounded
rude.
[YOU'RE BOTH RUDE.]
no subject
lapidarius
2016-04-07 07:18 am (UTC)
(
link
)
So did you. So let's just agree we were both a little blunt and move on.
Polnareff's my friend, as...
everything
as he tends to be. I don't make a habit of associating with complete imbeciles, so you can trust that obviously he isn't one.
no subject
mylegacy
2016-04-07 07:20 am (UTC)
(
link
)
Fine. But that's not what I meant. I just wanted to know what it is you like about him.
no subject
lapidarius
2016-04-07 07:27 am (UTC)
(
link
)
...He's a good person. Better than most, really. Polnareff's loyal, courageous, and one of the most caring people I know.
It's just that he's also dense, obtuse, and a little slow on the uptake.
997 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
no subject
[— thank you, pot.]
no subject
[if anyone is whipped in this relationship it is both of them.]
Just because he got away with something once doesn't mean he always does.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
[and he loves his friend so much, that idiot.]
no subject
[There's a questioning undercurrent here. Explain.]
no subject
'Annoying' is likely one of the first terms one would use to describe Joseph Joestar if they just met him.
['but you freely associate with him for roughly similar reasons.']
no subject
[Okay but you were, though.]
no subject
no subject
[YOU'RE BOTH RUDE.]
no subject
Polnareff's my friend, as...everything as he tends to be. I don't make a habit of associating with complete imbeciles, so you can trust that obviously he isn't one.
no subject
no subject
It's just that he's also dense, obtuse, and a little slow on the uptake.